Monthly Archives: April 2010

Alice in Wonderland – short, lonely review

The Alchemist, April 13, 2010, Volume 3, Number 119

Vol. 3, No. 119

Alice in Wonderland – short, lonely review

The new Alice in Wonderland is actually a return to Wonderland, set a dozen years or so after the original. While kids will enjoy the tale, anyone looking for a return to the wonderland of their childhood will be disappointed. In fact, it’s not even Wonderland anymore; Alice is told she heard it wrong as a child: it’s actually Underland.
The sole character in the film to achieve both likeable and friendly qualities is everyone’s usual favorite, the Cheshire Cat. Visually the cat is excellent, but making him so friendly is contrary to his intended role and deprives the story it’s best source of chaos.
Instead the task of chaos falls to Johnny Depp as the Mad Hatter. While Depp is a fine choice for the Hatter as the character was intended, here he is made not only a loving devotee of Alice, he is given the role of hero, a role that feels as forced as the story itself. The entire movie is spent looking for a hero, one Lewis Carroll easily provided with the White Knight – a character never brought into the film, which is surprising what with all the other outside references and usually-disregarded pieces of Alice in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass. That is the sole point on which the Hatter excels. He loves spouting out maddening strings of what seem to be unintelligible words and phrases but are actually parts of the nonsensical poems and other prose Carroll had in the original story. Then Burton had to go and try to explain how the Hatter became mad in the first place and all the fun goes out of it.
The same goes for nearly every character – most of them play their part well, Mia Wasikowska as Alice and Helena Bonham Carter as The Red Queen included, but the roles given to them just aren’t that great. Then there is Anne Hathaway as The White Queen, the character everyone on the side of good is supposed to be supporting and also the creepiest character in the film. She inspires no desire to support her at all.
Outside the flashy 3D effects, the most fun parts of the film are the CG characters who Burton managed to get right. For instance Tweedledee and Tweedledum are spectacular, but neither can they be heroes or main characters. The same goes for the March Hare, the Caterpillar and the Dormouse.
The story itself is an epic fail. The beginning is a copy of the original, the middle is a series of continual forced coincidences, and the end is a jumbled mess in need of a real hero: the aforementioned White Knight. There are some fun trips to be had in between, creepy ones too. If you take children they will want to get away from you to creep closer to the screen, but you’ll want to be near them at the moment they realize Alice is crossing a moat by walking across hundreds of vividly detailed severed heads.
After everything is said and done, the new Alice in Wonderland is just eye candy. If you just have to see it, see it now while it’s still on the big screen to get the best 3D effect.
If this were how the original stories went, Lewis Carroll would have been forgotten long ago. He may prefer that to the way he must be rolling in his grave right now.                    

~ Robin Canfield

Breakfast with the Alchy’s: Best Breakfasts of 2009

The Alchemist, April 6, 2010, Volume 3, Number 118

Vol. 3, No. 118

Breakfast with the Alchy’s
Best Breakfasts of 2009

Breakfast. It’s the most important meal of the day, right? Sometimes people eat it in the mornings even. That so many of you weighed in on the Best Breakfast in last years Alchy Awards just goes to show that many of you, our Readers, do as well. It took three months, but two of us at The Alchemist managed to breakfast at your top three picks to give them a quick once-over.
First up, the Best Breakfast Alchy Award Winner: the Wild Iris Platter at Nearly Normals on 15th near Monroe. Don’t show up before eight in the morning and on Sundays don’t bother at all. You order at the counter just inside the door so decide quickly or stick with the Platter like us. And remember, there’s no meat. After that most everything is self-serve, from plates to silverware, to running downstairs for more coffee. Upstairs has great natural light to bask in, but in the summer you want to sit out back.
The platter itself is a great collection of veggies with lots of flavor.
“I can’t imagine this without cheese,” Alchy #1 commented.
“It could do with sauce or eggs,” Alchy #2 added.
Over all we were well satisfied, any additions to the plate would really mean too much food. $14 each covered food, coffee and a tip and felt well worth it.
“It’s probably the healthiest of all three,” Alchy 1 said, “My mind is happy. My body is happy.”
Compared to Nearly Normals’ 30 years in town, second place went to an infant on the breakfast scene: ZIA. The winning dish: the Breakfast Burrito. It leaves a lot to be decided as they have multiple to choose from. Alchy #1 had the ZIA, Alchy #2 went with the Albuquerque.
“It’s very filling and tasty,” Alchy #2 commented.
The coffee is as tasty as the southwest style food, and the service came often and friendly, a hold-over from their time starting out at the Corvallis Farmer’s Market. You can spice up with red or green chile or lay off if your stomach is feeling weak, but don’t figure on stumbling in before 11 AM unless it’s the weekend. You might also stumble upon live music inside, but cramped inside the small area you may or may not want to hear it. Overall, it was a good meal for about $12 each.
“It was awesome,” Alchy #1 said, “I’m assuming they still use hand-rolled tortillas. That’s why it’s special.”
Third down the list was The Peacock 2×2×2 breakfast. That’s two eggs, two pancakes, and two pieces of bacon or sausage for just $2. Add a cup of coffee and so far you’ve almost doubled the cost. The service was good, with ambiance a bit different from your normal idea of going out for breakfast, but you can tuck yourself away in a corner if you feel like dining alone.
“`If you’re used to being here at night you may want to wear sunglasses,” Alchy #2 said.
The convenience is more the trump for the 2×2×2 breakfast. Doors open at seven in the morning, and even if there is a crowd there will always be a seat open. You just may end up closer too the jukebox than you’d like while you enjoy your meal. That may be your preference, though, if you pick up where you left off the night before and have a stiff drink as well.
“It’s the most affordable versus what you pay at home,” Alchy #1 commented.
“It makes me feel bad about paying for a Shari’s pancake,” Alchy #2 added.
That’s it for the three winners, but there is one more restaurant we added as the Editor’s Option. The Amber Room at Darrell’s is out where you may not notice it on the edge of town – at least it probably was the edge of town when Darrell’s opened in 1967. Now it sits just past Circle on 9th Street. There is a lot of traditional fare for about $7 – $9 a plate, and breakfast is served from seven in the morning to nine at night every day. Without a reader’s choice to go with, Alchy #1 decided on a Denver omelette and Alchy #2 tried a veggie skillet.
“Plenty of cheese and good flavor,” Alchy #1 said after finishing.
“The skillet wasn’t fantastic but I liked it,” Alchy #2 said, “The fruit on the side was hard to identify but tasty.”
The Amber Room also offers stiff drinks with breakfast. They have comfy leather seating, attentive service, and distractions galore – darts, billiards, scratch-its, etc. Plus, if you’re dining with a big group this place is perfect.
That’s it for the Alchemist’s breakfast exploration. Perhaps next we’ll check out the three choices for Best Dessert or Best Beer. What about you?
Find the rest of The Alchemist Award Winners from 2009 at www.corvalchemist.com.

~Robin Canfield